William Beutler on Wikipedia

The Grande Guide to Wikipedia

Tagged as , , , , , , ,
on May 3, 2011 at 8:14 am by William Beutler

In line with my cryptic tweet of yesterday afternoon (owing to an early scoop by The Next Web) here’s the big reveal: in the past few months I’ve been working with the marketing automation company Eloqua and design firm JESS3 (with whom I worked on “The State of Wikipedia” video) to write a new entry in their “Grande Guide” series of how-to manuals. Of course, I wrote about Wikipedia: “The Grande Guide to Wikipedia”:

Because Eloqua’s audience is marketers, they are also the focus of this guide. One of the first (rhetorical) questions raised in this guide is this: “Is Wikipedia a marketing opportunity?” The answer, more or less, is: “No, but…” While trying to use Wikipedia as a marketing tool is one of the surest ways to find yourself in trouble with Wikipedia editors, there are times where it is appropriate for someone who works with or for a company to make positive suggestions and even some non-controversial edits.

This subject makes Wikipedians understandably nervous. As evidence, consider the many tens of thousands (perhaps hundreds of thousands) of words expended on debating the propriety and rules surrounding paid editing—without coming to a resolution. The result is a confusing place where contributors with a financial interest are not exactly welcome, but also not disqualified. It can be very confusing. As Eloqua’s Joe Chernov writes:

It’s also important to note that we worked hard to preserve the integrity of the Wikipedia community throughout our Guide. We aimed to share how Wikipedia truly works, so that marketers can understand and appreciate it – not so they can game the system. We hope and trust that respect comes through in the content.

I hope you’ll read “The Grande Guide to Wikipedia” and, whether you’re a marketer curious about Wikipedia (more than a few of you, I know) or a Wikipedia editor skeptical of marketers (and not without reason!), I hope you’ll learn something new.

  1. Well said.

    The tenor of this post and the content you included in the guide are why Wikipedians trust this blog and your work. Hopefully more marketing types will follow these best practices for working transparently with the community.

  2. Thank you, Steven! I appreciate the kind words, and that’s exactly my intention with this guide. Do I expect many to follow this kind of open approach? Well, it’s still a thorny topic, so maybe not too soon. But I hope this can be the start.

  3. I took a look at the guide after seeing it mentioned in The Signpost and just wanted to come here and thank you for it. Althought it’s addressed to businesses thinking about marketing, it’s really a good quick general introduction to Wikipedia.

Comments are closed.